Free Markets versus State Intervention
- Those who favour a free market believe that people should be able to own property, enter into contracts, and compete for benefits.
- They contend that fair benefit distribution based on ability and merit would be guaranteed by unrestricted markets.
- Certain limitations are acceptable to proponents of the free market, such as guaranteeing a minimal quality of life.
- They suggest enabling people to purchase services while allowing markets to grow in industries like healthcare and education.
- Proponents contend that the market is impartial and concentrates on abilities and capabilities, giving customers more options.
- However, unregulated markets could not offer everyone access to high-quality products and services at reasonable costs.
- Private businesses could disadvantage the underprivileged by being expensive despite providing better services.
- Free markets, according to their detractors, favour the rich and powerful while excluding the weak and disadvantaged.
- In democratic societies, disagreements on fairness and distribution are constructive because they encourage discussion and compromise.
- It is necessary to research various justice tenets and come to consensus on the pursuit of justice in order to address social and economic disparities.
Chapter 4: Social Justice Class 11 Political Science Notes
Social justice includes the principles of equality and fairness in society. It attempts to guarantee that every person has access to resources, opportunities, and rights while addressing systematic inequities. Social justice, which has its roots in fairness and solidarity, aims to make up for past wrongs and build a more fair and inclusive society.
In this article, we will get an overview of social justice, concerning the meaning, importance, and further implications, from the perspective of class 11 Polity Notes!
Contact Us