Preserving Judicial Independence
The disallowance of post-retirement practice is fundamentally established in the guideline of legal freedom. Any actual or alleged conflicts of interest that could jeopardize the impartiality of judges must be avoided at all costs. If retired judges are allowed to continue practicing law, it could lead to compromises in the fair and just application of the law because their decisions as judges could be influenced by their future career prospects.
Why Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement?
Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement: The judiciary is tasked with upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all, making it an essential component of democracy. It is essential for judges to maintain their independence throughout their tenure in order to maintain impartiality and the public’s trust. The practice of preventing retired Supreme Court judges from practicing law has been established in many nations, including several with common law traditions like India and the United States. The significance of this restriction in maintaining the judiciary’s integrity is examined in this article.
Following are the reasons why the judges of the Supreme Court are prohibited to practice after retirement
Contact Us