Encouraging Judicial Retirement
The restriction on post-retirement practise can also serve as an incentive for judges to retire at a reasonable age, ensuring that the judiciary is replenished with new blood. By prohibiting retired judges from continuing legal practise, it encourages them to step down from their posts as soon as possible, allowing fresher and more varied legal minds to take their place on the court. This encourages variety, supports the progress of the court, and prevents stagnation in the interpretation and execution of the law.
Why Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement?
Judges of the Supreme Court are Prohibited to Practice After Retirement: The judiciary is tasked with upholding the rule of law and ensuring justice for all, making it an essential component of democracy. It is essential for judges to maintain their independence throughout their tenure in order to maintain impartiality and the public’s trust. The practice of preventing retired Supreme Court judges from practicing law has been established in many nations, including several with common law traditions like India and the United States. The significance of this restriction in maintaining the judiciary’s integrity is examined in this article.
Following are the reasons why the judges of the Supreme Court are prohibited to practice after retirement
Contact Us