Problem with Dining Philosopher

We have demonstrated that no two nearby philosophers can eat at the same time from the aforementioned solution to the dining philosopher problem. The problem with the above solution is that it might result in a deadlock situation. If every philosopher picks their left chopstick simultaneously, a deadlock results, and no philosopher can eat. This situation occurs when this happens.

Some of the solutions include the following: 

  1. The maximum number of philosophers at the table should not exceed four; in this case, philosopher P3 will have access to chopstick C4; he will then begin eating, and when he is finished, he will put down both chopsticks C3 and C4; as a result, semaphore C3 and C4 will now be incremented to 1. 
  2. Now that philosopher P2, who was holding chopstick C2, will also have chopstick C3, he will do the same when finished eating, allowing other philosophers to eat.
  3. While a philosopher in an odd position should select the right chopstick first, a philosopher in an even position should select the left chopstick and then the right chopstick.
  4. A philosopher should only be permitted to choose their chopsticks if both of the available chopsticks (the left and the right) are available at the same time.
  5. All four of the initial philosophers (P0, P1, P2, and P3) should choose the left chopstick before choosing the right, while P4 should choose the right chopstick before choosing the left. As a result, P4 will be forced to hold his right chopstick first because his right chopstick, C0, is already being held by philosopher P0 and its value is set to 0. As a result, P4 will become trapped in an infinite loop and chopstick C4 will remain empty. As a result, philosopher P3 has both the left C3 and the right C4. chopstick available, therefore it will start eating and will put down both chopsticks once finishes and let others eat which removes the problem of deadlock.

Dining Philosopher Problem Using Semaphores

The Dining Philosopher Problem states that K philosophers are seated around a circular table with one chopstick between each pair of philosophers. There is one chopstick between each philosopher. A philosopher may eat if he can pick up the two chopsticks adjacent to him. One chopstick may be picked up by any one of its adjacent followers but not both. 


Dining Philosopher


Similar Reads

Semaphore Solution to Dining Philosopher

Each philosopher is represented by the following pseudocode:...

Code

C++ #include #include #include #include #define N 5 #define THINKING 2 #define HUNGRY 1 #define EATING 0 #define LEFT (phnum + 4) % N #define RIGHT (phnum + 1) % N int state[N]; int phil[N] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 }; std::mutex mutex; std::condition_variable S[N]; void test(int phnum) { if (state[phnum] == HUNGRY && state[LEFT] != EATING && state[RIGHT] != EATING) { // state that eating state[phnum] = EATING; std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(2000)); std::cout << "Philosopher " << phnum + 1 << " takes fork " << LEFT + 1 << " and " << phnum + 1 << std::endl; std::cout << "Philosopher " << phnum + 1 << " is Eating" << std::endl; // notify the philosopher that he can start eating S[phnum].notify_all(); } } // take up chopsticks void take_fork(int phnum) { std::unique_lock lock(mutex); // state that hungry state[phnum] = HUNGRY; std::cout << "Philosopher " << phnum + 1 << " is Hungry" << std::endl; // eat if neighbours are not eating test(phnum); // if unable to eat wait to be signalled S[phnum].wait(lock); std::this_thread::sleep_for(std::chrono::milliseconds(1000)); } // put down chopsticks void put_fork(int phnum) { std::unique_lock lock(mutex); // state that thinking state[phnum] = THINKING; std::cout << "Philosopher " << phnum + 1 << " putting fork " << LEFT + 1 << " and " << phnum + 1 << " down" << std::endl; std::cout << "Philosopher " << phnum + 1 << " is thinking" << std::endl; test(LEFT); test(RIGHT); } void philosopher(int num) { while (true) { take_fork(num); put_fork(num); } } int main() { std::thread threads[N]; for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) { threads[i] = std::thread(philosopher, i); std::cout << "Philosopher " << i + 1 << " is thinking" << std::endl; } for (int i = 0; i < N; i++) threads[i].join(); return 0; } C #include #include #include #define N 5 #define THINKING 2 #define HUNGRY 1 #define EATING 0 #define LEFT (phnum + 4) % N #define RIGHT (phnum + 1) % N int state[N]; int phil[N] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 }; sem_t mutex; sem_t S[N]; void test(int phnum) { if (state[phnum] == HUNGRY && state[LEFT] != EATING && state[RIGHT] != EATING) { // state that eating state[phnum] = EATING; sleep(2); printf("Philosopher %d takes fork %d and %d\n", phnum + 1, LEFT + 1, phnum + 1); printf("Philosopher %d is Eating\n", phnum + 1); // sem_post(&S[phnum]) has no effect // during takefork // used to wake up hungry philosophers // during putfork sem_post(&S[phnum]); } } // take up chopsticks void take_fork(int phnum) { sem_wait(&mutex); // state that hungry state[phnum] = HUNGRY; printf("Philosopher %d is Hungry\n", phnum + 1); // eat if neighbours are not eating test(phnum); sem_post(&mutex); // if unable to eat wait to be signalled sem_wait(&S[phnum]); sleep(1); } // put down chopsticks void put_fork(int phnum) { sem_wait(&mutex); // state that thinking state[phnum] = THINKING; printf("Philosopher %d putting fork %d and %d down\n", phnum + 1, LEFT + 1, phnum + 1); printf("Philosopher %d is thinking\n", phnum + 1); test(LEFT); test(RIGHT); sem_post(&mutex); } void* philosopher(void* num) { while (1) { int* i = num; sleep(1); take_fork(*i); sleep(0); put_fork(*i); } } int main() { int i; pthread_t thread_id[N]; // initialize the semaphores sem_init(&mutex, 0, 1); for (i = 0; i < N; i++) sem_init(&S[i], 0, 0); for (i = 0; i < N; i++) { // create philosopher processes pthread_create(&thread_id[i], NULL, philosopher, &phil[i]); printf("Philosopher %d is thinking\n", i + 1); } for (i = 0; i < N; i++) pthread_join(thread_id[i], NULL); }...

Problem with Dining Philosopher

We have demonstrated that no two nearby philosophers can eat at the same time from the aforementioned solution to the dining philosopher problem. The problem with the above solution is that it might result in a deadlock situation. If every philosopher picks their left chopstick simultaneously, a deadlock results, and no philosopher can eat. This situation occurs when this happens....

FAQs on Dining Philosopher Problem Using Semaphores

Q.1: What is the main challenge in the dining philosophers problem?...

Contact Us