Paramountcy Policy
Under Lord Hastings, a new “paramountcy” policy was put into place (Governor-General from 1813 to 1823). The business claimed that it could annex or threaten to annex any Indian state since its power was superior or paramount. This was seen as the foundational model for various British initiatives that came later. According to the Policy of Paramountcy, the East India Company claimed that its powers were greater than those of Indian states and that they were supreme or paramount. The British established an indirect company government in Afghanistan as a result of the protracted war they fought there between 1838 and 1842. Sindh was taken over.
After two protracted wars, Punjab was annexed in 1849 under Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s authority. The British changed their grip over the northwest during these decades due to worries about a Russian invasion. Through a number of strategies, including the ring-fencing policy, subordinate isolation, and subordinate union, British paramountcy evolved. The British used a variety of strategies to create the idea of paramountcy, including direct annexation through war and a subsidiary alliance structure through treaties. The British nobility has gone through three major stages over the span of two centuries:
What is the Policy of Paramountcy?
The Paramountcy policy was put into place by Lord Wellesley in the early nineteenth century (1800-1825). This was one of the methods the British employed to establish their dominance and interfere with the administration of Indian states. As a result of this policy, the British East India Company assumed supreme legal and political authority, and in order to safeguard its interests, it authorized the acquisition of any Indian territory.
Contact Us