High-Level Design (HLD) for Google’s Search Autocomplete

1. Clients:

  • These are the end-users or applications that interact with the autocomplete system to get search suggestions.
  • Clients send search queries to the API Gateway for processing and receive autocomplete suggestions in response.
  • The API Gateway acts as an entry point for clients to access the autocomplete system.
  • It receives incoming requests from clients, routes them to the appropriate backend services, and handles authentication, authorization, and rate limiting.
  • In contrast to Google Search Autocomplete, the API Gateway in your system design abstracts the internal components and provides a unified interface for clients to interact with the system.
  • Load balancers distribute incoming client requests across multiple instances of the suggestion service to ensure scalability, fault tolerance, and optimal resource utilization.
  • They monitor the health of backend servers and route traffic accordingly.
  • In the context of Google Search Autocomplete, load balancers ensure that requests are evenly distributed among suggestion service instances to handle varying loads efficiently.

4. Suggestion Service:

  • The suggestion service is the core component responsible for generating autocomplete suggestions based on incoming search queries.
  • It processes queries, retrieves relevant suggestions from the data store (Redis cache or NoSQL Trie data servers), and returns them to the client via the API Gateway.
  • This service may incorporate various algorithms and data structures to efficiently retrieve and rank suggestions.
  • In contrast to Google Search Autocomplete, the suggestion service in the design is responsible for both fetching suggestions and serving them to clients.
  • Redis cache is an in-memory data store used to cache frequently accessed search queries and their corresponding autocomplete suggestions.
  • It helps reduce latency by storing precomputed results and serving them quickly to clients without hitting the backend data store.
  • Redis cache improves performance by caching frequently requested suggestions, reducing the load on the backend suggestion service and improving overall system responsiveness.

6. NoSQL Trie Data Servers:

  • NoSQL Trie data servers store the trie data structure used for efficient prefix matching and search.
  • They maintain a distributed, scalable database of search queries organized in a trie format, allowing for fast lookup of autocomplete suggestions.
  • These servers store the raw trie data structure, enabling efficient retrieval of suggestions without needing to compute them on the fly.

7. Snapshots Database:

  • The snapshots database stores periodic snapshots or backups of the system’s data for disaster recovery, backup, and archival purposes.
  • It ensures data integrity and provides a fallback mechanism in case of data loss or corruption.
  • In contrast to Google Search Autocomplete, the snapshots database in your system design ensures data durability and availability, enabling the system to recover from failures and maintain consistent data across different components.
  • Zookeeper is a centralized service for maintaining configuration information, providing distributed synchronization, and facilitating coordination among distributed systems.
  • It helps manage distributed resources, elect leaders, and maintain consensus in a distributed environment.
  • In contrast to Google Search Autocomplete, Zookeeper ensures the coordination and consistency of distributed components in your system design, such as load balancers, suggestion services, and data servers, enabling them to work together seamlessly and maintain system integrity

Google’s Search Autocomplete High-Level Design(HLD)

Google Search Autocomplete is a feature that predicts and suggests search queries as users type into the search bar. As users begin typing a query, Google’s autocomplete algorithm generates a dropdown menu with suggested completions based on popular searches, user history, and other relevant factors.

  • In this article, we’ll discuss the high-level design of Google’s Search Autocomplete feature. This functionality predicts and suggests search queries as users type, enhancing the search experience.
  • We’ll explore the architecture, components, and challenges involved in building a scalable and efficient autocomplete system. Understanding Google’s approach can provide valuable insights for developers and engineers working on similar systems.

Important Topics for Google’s Search Autocomplete High-Level Design

  • Requirements Gathering for Google’s Search Autocomplete
  • Capacity Estimation for Google’s Search Autocomplete
  • High-Level Design (HLD) for Google’s Search Autocomplete
  • Scalability for Google’s Search Autocomplete

Similar Reads

Requirements Gathering for Google’s Search Autocomplete

Functional Requirements for Google’s Search Autocomplete...

Capacity Estimation for Google’s Search Autocomplete

Traffic Estimations for Google’s Search Autocomplete...

High-Level Design (HLD) for Google’s Search Autocomplete

...

Scalability for Google’s Search Autocomplete

More pe­ople using the system me­ans more traffic. To handle the e­xtra load, the system can add more se­rvers. These se­rvers help spread out the­ traffic. Load balancers make sure the­ traffic is shared evenly across all se­rvers. The system also store­s data that people ask for often. Storing this data me­ans the servers don’t have­ to get it from storage eve­ry time. Separate database­s and microservices also let the­ system easily grow as more pe­ople use it....

Contact Us