Disadvantages of Kanban
- Complexity in Scaling: Kanban works well for projects with small to medium team sizes and workloads but gets trickier as workloads and team sizes increase.
- Lack of Predefined Retrospectives: Unlike Scrum which has inbuilt retrospective ceremonies, Kanban lacks such ceremonies. In order to support process changes, teams must be self-directed in scheduling, and conducting retrospective ceremonies.
- Lack of Deadline Focus: Kanban is not usually oriented for a rigid deadline and may not be of much help in time-related issues.
- Overreliance on Visual Management: Using many visual boards may also cause teams to forget or even ignore key documentation that is essential in highly dynamic and/or complicated projects.
- Continuous Monitoring Required: Failing to review and adapt to changes regularly might cause inefficiency, as Kanban needs to be monitored and adjusted constantly.
What are the Core Principles of Visualizing Work in Kanban?
Kanban is an ancient system of management; it enhances the workflows. An engineer at Toyota developed it and referred to it as a part of the Toyota Production System. The term “Kanban” comes from the Japanese language. It means either “visual cards” or “signals”. In addition, visualizing work within Kanban is crucial for it to be effective in running workflows and improving them.
Contact Us