Disadvantages of Earned Value Analysis (EVA)
- Complexity: EVA involves complex calculations and terminology, which can be challenging for project teams to understand, especially for smaller projects or teams with limited expertise.
- Resource-Intensive: Implementing EVA requires tracking detailed data and maintaining comprehensive records. This can be resource-intensive, and some organizations may lack the necessary tools or resources for effective EVA implementation.
- Subjectivity in Earned Value Calculation: The “earned value” itself can be subject to interpretation, especially in situations where there are gray areas regarding the completion of work packages or milestones.
- Assumption of Linear Progression: EVA assumes linear progression, which means that it may not work well for projects with irregular or non-linear progress patterns, such as research and development projects.
- Time-Consuming: Calculating and updating EVA metrics can be time-consuming, which may not be suitable for projects that require quick decision-making and frequent changes.
- Focus on Metrics vs. Problem Solving: Overemphasis on EVA metrics can sometimes lead to a focus on numbers rather than addressing the underlying issues causing performance problems.
What is Earned Value Analysis (EVA)?
DefenseEarned Value Analysis (EVA) is also called “Budget cost of work performed”. It is considered a refinement of the cost-monitoring technique. This analysis was first carried out USA’s Department of Defense (DOD). In this analysis, a “value” is assigned to each track or work package based on the expenditure forecast. The value assigned is known as the “planned value (PV)”. The work that has not yet begun is given a value known as the “earned value of zero”. The total value credited to a project is called “earned value(EV)”, which is also represented as “money value”.
Contact Us