Disadvantages of Cypress
- No Built-in Mobile Testing:Cypress lacks built-in support for mobile testing, requiring third-party plugins for mobile testing, which may not be as comprehensive as physical device testing.
- Limited Language Compatibility: While Selenium and Playwright support multiple programming languages, Cypress primarily works with JavaScript/TypeScript.
- Single Browser Instance: Cypress runs tests in a single browser instance, making multi-tab testing challenging without workarounds.
- Limited iframe Support: Cypress’s support for iframes can be limited and unreliable
- Tab Key Support: Cypress lacks native support for the Tab key, necessitating the use of plugins
- XPath Locator Not Supported: It does not support locating elements by XPath without the use of a plugin.
- File Upload/Download Limitations: Cypress does not directly support file upload/download fields, necessitating the installation of plugins for these functions.
Selenium vs Cypress – Which Framework is better to learn Selenium or Cypress?
This article focuses on discussing the key considerations when choosing between Cypress and Selenium for Automation testing. We’ll compare their features, benefits, and limitations, helping one determine which framework aligns best with the testing requirements and objectives.
Table of Content
- What is Selenium?
- Advantages of Selenium
- Disadvantages of Selenium
- What is Cypress?
- Advantages of Cypress
- Disadvantages of Cypress
- Cypress vs Selenium
- When to use Selenium
- When to use Cypress
- Conclusion
- FAQ’s
Contact Us