Difference between One Pass and Two Pass Compiler

One pass Two-pass
It performs Translation in one pass It performs Translation in two pass
It scans the entire file only once. It requires two passes to scan the source file.
It generates Intermediate code  It does not generate Intermediate code
It is faster than two pass assembler It is slower than two pass assembler
A loader is not required  A loader is required.
No object program is written. A loader is required as the object code is generated.
Perform some professing of assembler directives. Perform processing of assembler directives not done in pass-1

The data structure used are:

The symbol table, literal table, pool table, and table of incomplete.

The data structure used are:

The symbol table, literal table, and pool table.

These assemblers perform the whole conversion of assembly code to machine code in one go. These assemblers first process the assembly code and store values in the opcode table and symbol table and then in the second step they generate the machine code using these tables.
Example: C and Pascal uses One Pass Compiler. Example: Modula-2 uses Multi Pass Compiler.

Single Pass vs Two-Pass (Multi-Pass) Compilers

This article explores the concept of compiler passes in the field of software development, focusing on two types: the Single Pass Compiler and the Two-Pass Compiler (Multi-Pass Compiler). It explains their differences, advantages, and use cases, providing insights into the world of compiler design.

Similar Reads

What is a Compiler Pass?

A Compiler pass refers to the traversal of a compiler through the entire program. Compiler passes are of two types Single Pass Compiler, and Two Pass Compiler or Multi-Pass Compiler. These are explained as follows....

Types of Compiler Pass

1. Single Pass Compiler...

Difference between One Pass and Two Pass Compiler

One pass Two-pass It performs Translation in one pass It performs Translation in two pass It scans the entire file only once. It requires two passes to scan the source file. It generates Intermediate code  It does not generate Intermediate code It is faster than two pass assembler It is slower than two pass assembler A loader is not required  A loader is required. No object program is written. A loader is required as the object code is generated. Perform some professing of assembler directives. Perform processing of assembler directives not done in pass-1 The data structure used are: The symbol table, literal table, pool table, and table of incomplete. The data structure used are: The symbol table, literal table, and pool table. These assemblers perform the whole conversion of assembly code to machine code in one go. These assemblers first process the assembly code and store values in the opcode table and symbol table and then in the second step they generate the machine code using these tables. Example: C and Pascal uses One Pass Compiler. Example: Modula-2 uses Multi Pass Compiler....

Conclusion

In conclusion, the choice between a single-pass and a two-pass compiler depends on specific requirements and trade-offs. Single-pass compilers are faster and more compact but have limitations in optimization and grammar complexity. Two-pass compilers, on the other hand, offer greater flexibility for different programming languages and machine systems but come at the cost of additional processing. Understanding these distinctions is crucial for designing effective compilers....

Contact Us