Difference between Apache ActiveMQ and Kafka
|
Characteristics |
Apache ActiveMQ |
Kafka |
|---|---|---|
|
License |
Apache ActiveMQ has Apache License 2.0 |
Kafka has Apache License 2.0 |
|
Scalability |
Scalable but not built or optimized to manage situations at extreme scales, such as Kafka. |
Incredibly scalable. When dispersed across hundreds of brokers, Kafka can manage petabytes of data and trillions of messages daily. |
|
Message consumption |
ActiveMQ from Apache has push and pull. |
Kafka has pull, or extended polling. |
|
Performance |
Low latency and good throughput (with medium workloads). ActiveMQ Artemis is intended to provide enhanced performance in contrast to ActiveMQ Classic. |
Incredibly low latencies (in the millisecond range) combined with high throughput workloads (millions of messages per second). |
|
Persistence |
To persist data, ActiveMQ Classic employs a database that complies with JDBC standards or KahaDB (file-based storage). |
The disc is where messages are kept it has infinite capacity to store info. |
Apache ActiveMQ Vs Kafka
Apache ActiveMQ and Kafka are an open-source and multi-protocol messaging server created on Java. These can support multiple messaging protocols such as AMQP, STOMP, and MQTT and they support the Java Message Service API. Messages between applications and services are frequently sent using it. Kafka is a platform for event streaming, whereas ActiveMQ is a messaging broker. These are two well-liked open-source messaging platforms that support data management and monitoring.
In this article, we will be discussing Apache ActiveMQ vs Kafka.
Contact Us