Cons of Software Quality Assurance Plan
- Overhead in Small Projects: The cost of developing and upholding a detailed SQA plan may be excessive for small projects compared to their scope and complexity.
- Opposition to Change: An SQA strategy may involve changes that teams accustomed to their current workflows find difficult to accept, which could result in a time of adjustment and resistance.
- Documentation Complexity: SQA plans with high documentation requirements run the risk of adding complexity and coming off as bureaucratic to teams, which makes it difficult to keep documentation up to date.
- Reliance on Human Elements: An SQA plan’s performance depends on human elements like procedure adherence and attention to detail, which makes human mistake a possibility.
Software Quality Assurance Plan in Software Development
A software quality assurance plan’s main goal is to guarantee that the market’s product or service is trouble- and bug-free. Additionally, it must fulfill the specifications listed in the SRS (software requirement specification).
An SQA plan serves three purposes. It includes the following:
- Determining the QA duties assigned to the concerned team.
- A list of the areas that require review, audit, and examination.
- Determines the work products for SQA.
Table of Content
- What Is a Software Quality Assurance Plan?
- Importance of Software Quality Assurance Plan
- Objectives And Goals of Software Quality Assurance Plan:
- Steps to Develop Software Quality Assurance Plan:
- SQA implementation phase:
- Best Practices for Creating Software Quality Assurance Plan:
- Why is SQA Plan Important for Software Companies?
- Pros of Software Quality Assurance Plan:
- Cons of Software Quality Assurance Plan:
- Conclusion:
Contact Us