Challenges and Controversies in Extradition

1. Political Offenses: The definition of ‘political offenses’ immune from extradition is a contentious issue. This may be arbitrary, giving rise to claims that nations reject the extradition of their opponents for political reasons.

2. Double Standards: When powerful countries demand the extradition of fugitives from other countries while opposing the extradition of their own individuals, it raises concerns.

3. Risk of Torture or Inhuman Treatment: Extraditing someone to a nation with a dismal human rights record raises serious concerns about the possibility of torture or an unjust trial.

4. Death Penalty: Nations without the death penalty could be hesitant to extradite a person to a nation where they might be put to death.

5. Legal Complexities: Because different nations have different legal systems, extradition might be difficult. It is possible that evidence obtained in one nation may not be accepted in another.

6. Lengthy Procedures: Extradition may be a drawn-out, bureaucratic procedure that fugitives can take advantage of by creating delays and openings.

7. Cost and Resources: Both the seeking and the solicited countries may find extradition to be a resource-intensive procedure.

8. Absence of Universal Standards: Application differences may arise from the lack of a common framework for extradition.

Extradition: Legal Framework, Procedures, Rights & Challenges

Similar Reads

What is Extradition?

Extradition is the official procedure of turning over a person to another state for prosecution or punishment for crimes committed inside the requested nation’s borders. ‘Extradition’ is derived from two words: ‘ex’ which means ‘out’, and ‘tradium’, which means ‘give up’. The word is based on the Latin legal maxim “aut dedere aut judicare,” which means ‘either extradite or prosecute’. Usually, a bilateral or multinational treaty makes such extradition possible. There are very few governments that will extradite without a treaty. The territorial state and the requesting state are the two states that are involved in extradition. The accused or convicted person leaves to avoid trial or punishment in the ‘territorial state’. The ‘requesting state’, on the other hand, is the location of the offense or the purported location of the offense. Through diplomatic channels and following any treaty, the requesting state formally seeks the accused’s or convict’s surrender....

Legal Framework for Extradition

According to U.S. law (18 U.S.C. § 3184), extradition can only be authorized in accordance with a treaty....

Extradition Procedures and Processes

1. Request to the US State Department: An official request for extradition is made to the US State Department by the foreign government. Usually, this request consists of:...

Rights and Protections in Extradition Proceedings

1. Right to a Hearing: In order to contest the extradition request, the sought party is entitled to a fair hearing in court. They have the opportunity to raise objections to extradition during this hearing, including:...

Challenges and Controversies in Extradition

1. Political Offenses: The definition of ‘political offenses’ immune from extradition is a contentious issue. This may be arbitrary, giving rise to claims that nations reject the extradition of their opponents for political reasons....

Conclusion

In order to combat crime and uphold justice on a global scale, extradition is a sophisticated but essential instrument. It enables nations to apprehend runaways and send them back to the area where the alleged crime was committed. Extradition is based on two main sources; i.e., US domestic law and international agreements, or treaties. Extradition is still essential for international law enforcement collaboration. More standard operating procedures are being developed while respecting human rights in matters of extradition....

Extradition- FAQs

Who can request extradition?...

Contact Us