Causes of Shrinkflation

  • Escalating input costs:  Manufacturers’ costs increase when the price of a commodity rises. One choice is to cut back on the input’s volume. Numerous manufacturers struggled in 2009–2011 as cocoa prices increased. As a result, many chocolate bars had to be made smaller in order to cover the increased cost of the raw materials. The producer’s profit margin can be increased by reducing the items’ weight, volume, or quantity while keeping the retail price the same. The typical buyer won’t notice a slight decrease in quantity, though. Sales volume won’t be impacted as a result.
  • Supermarkets’ monopolistic purchasing power: Although the retail supermarket business is competitive, the large supermarkets have enormous sway over their suppliers. Supermarkets frequently work very hard to keep costs down in a competitive market. When supermarkets don’t want to pass on price increases to customers, shrinkflation is a solution. 
  • Ferocious market competition: Shrinkflation may also result from fierce market competition. Given that consumers have access to a wide range of available substitutes, the food and beverage market is often one that is very competitive. As a result, producers search for solutions that will allow them to maintain both their profit margins and the goodwill of their customers. As an illustration, consider how supermarkets, which operate on a big scale and don’t pass on the burden of rising costs to the customers, have a competitive advantage. The only alternative open to small producers is to stick with this tactic and keep retail pricing steady in order to keep customers.

Shrinkflation

Shrinkflation is a circumstance in which a product’s size “shrinks” or decreases even though its price stays the same. When a product’s size shrinks while its cost stays the same, this indicates that the product’s price is inflated and that the cost per unit of weight has grown. This approach is used by businesses as an alternative to raising prices right away because it has little to no impact on consumer indices like the consumer price index. However, a reduction in the size of the product actually causes prices to increase. Therefore, it represents a convert inflationary mechanism. Given that it may be viewed as less harsh than a price increase, it is frequently employed as a strategy to avoid raising costs and alienating customers. This phenomena, which was first described by the British economist Pippa Malmgren. It has gained popularity recently as a result of rising production and ingredient costs.

Similar Reads

Causes of Shrinkflation:

Escalating input costs:  Manufacturers’ costs increase when the price of a commodity rises. One choice is to cut back on the input’s volume. Numerous manufacturers struggled in 2009–2011 as cocoa prices increased. As a result, many chocolate bars had to be made smaller in order to cover the increased cost of the raw materials. The producer’s profit margin can be increased by reducing the items’ weight, volume, or quantity while keeping the retail price the same. The typical buyer won’t notice a slight decrease in quantity, though. Sales volume won’t be impacted as a result. Supermarkets’ monopolistic purchasing power: Although the retail supermarket business is competitive, the large supermarkets have enormous sway over their suppliers. Supermarkets frequently work very hard to keep costs down in a competitive market. When supermarkets don’t want to pass on price increases to customers, shrinkflation is a solution.  Ferocious market competition: Shrinkflation may also result from fierce market competition. Given that consumers have access to a wide range of available substitutes, the food and beverage market is often one that is very competitive. As a result, producers search for solutions that will allow them to maintain both their profit margins and the goodwill of their customers. As an illustration, consider how supermarkets, which operate on a big scale and don’t pass on the burden of rising costs to the customers, have a competitive advantage. The only alternative open to small producers is to stick with this tactic and keep retail pricing steady in order to keep customers....

Shrinkflation’s Effects:

Consumers and businesses may experience a variety of repercussions from shrinkflation....

Implications of Shrinkflation:

Inflation: Inflation that is not visible is a result. The reason for this is that inflation indexes only take into account changes in average price levels, ignoring little variations in product sizes. The indexes are predicated on the idea that the product basket won’t change. Although the cost of the product as a whole doesn’t increase, the cost per unit of weight or volume does. Consumers typically are unaware of the slight quantity reduction. Consumer Trust: Although the majority of buyers might not detect slight variations in the quantity or size of the product, they might learn the truth later on and feel duped. Customer trust is tarnished by it....

Contact Us