Berubari Union Case – 1960
- The Supreme Court said in the Berubari Union case (1960) that according to it, the Preamble shows what they were trying to achieve with different parts of their constitution. So it helps us understand better how this part was made.
- Additionally, when the words in any article are unclear or can have more than one meaning, a little help with understanding might be taken from the goals written down in the Preamble.
- Even though people know the Preamble is important, the Supreme Court said clearly that it isn’t part of the Constitution.
Basic Structure Doctrine of Indian Constitution
The Basic Structure Doctrine is a foundation stone in comprehending the vitality and plastic nature of our Constitution. This doctrine, established by the Indian Supreme Court serves as a guiding principle. It protects Constitution’s basic structure against amendments that might change its essential concepts. But defining the core of Basic Structure Doctrine reveals the crux of India’s constitutional spirit and its promise to defend democratic values, rights, and rule by law. This article discusses the Basic Structure Doctrine in India, a constitutional principle that limits Parliament’s power to amend fundamental aspects of the Constitution, preserving its core principles.
Table of Content
- Evolution of Basic Structure Doctrine
- Evolution of the Basic Structure Concept
- Shankari Prasad Case – 1951
- Berubari Union Case – 1960
- Sajjan Singh Case -1965
- Golaknath case – 1967
- 24th Constitution Amendment Act – 1971
- Kesavananda Bharati vs. State of Kerala – 1973
- Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain case – 1975
- 42nd Amendment Act – 1976
- Minerva Mills case -1980
- Waman Rao Case (1981)
- Indra Sawhney versus Union of India – 1992
- Kihoto Hollohan Case -1993
- S.R. Bommai case – 1994
- Significance of the Basic Structure Doctrine
- Criticisms of Basic Structure Doctrine
Contact Us