Server vs. Serverless Architecture

Kubernetes - Monolithic Architecture of Kubernetes

Authentication and Authorization in Microservices

There are two main ways to run applications in the cloud: traditional servers and serverless computing. Traditional servers require you to manage everything, from hardware to scaling. Serverless computing lets you focus on writing code, with the cloud provider handling the infrastructure. Each has its pros and cons, depending on factors like cost, scalability, and complexity. This article compares both approaches, helping you decide which is right for your project.

Important Topics for Server vs. Serverless Architecture

What is Server Architecture?
What is Serverless Architecture?
Differences Between Server and Serverless Architecture
Use Cases of Server Architecture
Use Cases of Serverless Architecture

What is Server Architecture?

Server architecture refers to the design and arrangement of hardware, software, and networking components within a server system. It encompasses the organization and configuration of these components to efficiently manage resources, facilitate communication, and deliver services to clients over a network.

Server architecture encompasses the structural design and configuration of hardware, software, and networking components within a server system.
It involves decisions regarding hardware selection, operating system deployment, networking infrastructure setup, server software installation, virtualization or containerization techniques.

What is Serverless Architecture?

Serverless architecture, also known as serverless computing or Function as a Service (FaaS), is a cloud computing model where the cloud provider dynamically manages the allocation and provisioning of servers to run applications.

In a serverless architecture, developers write code as individual functions or small units of code, and the cloud provider automatically manages the infrastructure required to execute these functions in response to events or triggers.
Serverless architectures are inherently scalable, as the cloud provider automatically scales the infrastructure to handle changes in workload demand.
Functions are executed in parallel across multiple instances to accommodate spikes in traffic, and developers are only billed for the resources used during execution.

Differences Between Server and Serverless Architecture

Here’s a comparison between server and serverless architectures presented in a tabular form:

Aspect	Server Architecture	Serverless Architecture
Infrastructure Management	Developers manage underlying servers or VMs.	Cloud provider manages infrastructure (servers).
Resource Allocation	Resources provisioned based on anticipated workload.	Resources dynamically allocated based on demand.
Scaling	Scaling typically involves manual or automated processes.	Automatic scaling based on workload fluctuations.
Cost Model	Costs include upfront investments and ongoing management.	Pay-per-use pricing model based on function invocations.
State Management	Applications maintain state on server side.	Serverless functions are stateless by design.

Use Cases of Server Architecture

Below are some common use cases for server architecture:

Use Case	Description
Web Applications	Traditional web applications that require full control over the server environment, such as content management systems, e-commerce platforms, and enterprise software.
Database Management	Applications that require direct access to databases for data storage, retrieval, and manipulation, such as customer relationship management (CRM) systems and inventory management.
Real-time Communication	Applications that rely on persistent connections or real-time communication protocols, such as chat applications, multiplayer games, and video conferencing platforms.
High-performance Computing	Workloads that demand high computational power or specialized hardware, such as scientific simulations, financial modeling, and data analytics.
Legacy Systems Integration	Integrating with legacy systems or third-party APIs that are not compatible with serverless architectures or require custom infrastructure configurations.

Use Cases of Serverless Architecture

Below are some common use cases for both serverless architecture:

Use Case	Description
Event-driven Processing	Applications that respond to events or triggers, such as HTTP requests, database changes, file uploads, or scheduled tasks, with short-lived and stateless functions.
Asynchronous Task Execution	Background processing tasks, such as image or video processing, file conversion, data validation, or batch processing, that can be executed independently of user interactions.
Microservices Architecture	Decomposing monolithic applications into smaller, independently deployable services, each implemented as a serverless function, to enable scalability and agility.
IoT Data Processing	Processing and analyzing data streams from IoT devices, sensors, or edge devices, where workloads can vary unpredictably and scale dynamically based on demand.
Serverless APIs and Webhooks	Exposing APIs or webhooks for third-party integrations, webhooks, or serverless computing services, where functions are invoked in response to external events or requests.

Tags:

#System Design