International Comparisons – Human Development Group

Let us discuss about the International Comparisons in the context of Human Development Group. The analysis reveals that the high human development group consists of 53 countries. It gives priority to education and healthcare with significant investment in social sectors and good governance. Notably, it includes so many imperial powers who have relatively low social diversity. On the other hand, the medium human development group contains 42 countries. It contains mostly post-World war two. The Soviet Union breakup adopted the people-oriented policies to reduce social discrimination. It depicts the higher social diversity and political instability. The low human development group consists of 43 countries. These countries face many urgent challenges like different political challenges, instability in society, and outbreaks of diseases leading to well-thought-out policies. The lower human development index is driven by different cultural factors like religion and community affiliation. 

International Comparisons| Class 12 Geography Notes

International Comparisons is a subpart of the Class 12 Geography Notes Chapter 3 which is entitled Human Development. International Comparisons are also known as the national evaluation indicators. They are the quantitative, qualitative, and evaluative analytical method that shows the performance of a country based on its relation with other countries. The value becomes more clear and visible in the context of territorial size and per capita income while analyzing the human development of the various nations. 

In this article, we are going to discuss Class 12 Geography Chapter 3 subpart International Comparisons in detail.

Table of Content

  • International Comparisons
  • International Comparisons – Human Development Group
  • Conclusion – Class 12 Geography Notes Chapter 3 International Comparisons
  • FAQs – Class 12 Geography Notes Chapter 3 International Comparisons

Similar Reads

International Comparisons

International comparisons of human development are an interesting factor where the size of a particular territory and its per capita income are not connected directly to the evaluation process of human development. The smaller countries also have done better than larger countries in the context of human development. On the other side, the poor nations also hold a higher rank than the other rich countries in the same context. In the context of human development, Sri Lanka, Trinidad, and Tobago hold a higher rank than India. These countries have the same economy as India but they are doing better in the human development index. In the same way, the Kerala state performs better than the Punjab state of India. There are four major classifications on which human development can be scaled in the right way as mentioned below....

International Comparisons – Human Development Group

Let us discuss about the International Comparisons in the context of Human Development Group. The analysis reveals that the high human development group consists of 53 countries. It gives priority to education and healthcare with significant investment in social sectors and good governance. Notably, it includes so many imperial powers who have relatively low social diversity. On the other hand, the medium human development group contains 42 countries. It contains mostly post-World war two. The Soviet Union breakup adopted the people-oriented policies to reduce social discrimination. It depicts the higher social diversity and political instability. The low human development group consists of 43 countries. These countries face many urgent challenges like different political challenges, instability in society, and outbreaks of diseases leading to well-thought-out policies. The lower human development index is driven by different cultural factors like religion and community affiliation....

Conclusion

International comparisons of human development are an interesting factor where the size of a particular territory and its per capita income are not connected directly to the evaluation process of human development. Understanding the persistent disparities in human development levels within regions necessitates an examination of government spending patterns in the social sector and the prevailing political landscape. On the other side, the degree of individual freedom is also considered as the factor of the higher human development index. Countries with a higher human development index focus on the social sector investment experience political stability and hold equal social distribution as well....

International Comparisons- FAQs

What is the international comparison method?...

Contact Us