Difference Between WebScokets & Long Polling
|
Features |
WebSockets |
Long Polling |
|---|---|---|
|
Communication Type |
Full-duplex bidirectional |
Simulated bidirectional |
|
Connection Establishment |
Persistent connection |
Repeatedly opened and closed |
|
Latency |
Low (real-time updates) |
Variable (depends on polling frequency) |
|
Server Load |
Lower due to persistent connections |
Potentially higher due to open connections |
|
Compatibility |
Requires native support |
Compatible with standard HTTP |
|
Firewall & Proxy Support |
May face challenges |
Firewall and proxy-friendly |
WebSockets Protocol and Long Polling
As one facet of net development, real-time access Among consumers and servers has now become an important step in creating interactive web programs as well as mouth-watering. Request-reaction mechanisms, even flexible and powerful as they are, may not be suitable for circumstances that call for rapid data transfer or coffee latency time. Fortunately, two famous techniques handle precisely these demands: WebSockets and Long Polling. In this article, we will look into the details of every protocol and examine their respective advantages/disadvantages while considering which applications are best suited.
Contact Us